The Effective Litigation Hold Letter

Our recent post on the ramifications of destroying social media content got us thinking about the importance of an effective legal hold letter.  Also known as a “preservation” or “hold” order, this document instructs an entity or individual to preserve all data that may reasonably relate to pending or anticipated litigation.  A goal of the litigation hold is to suspend the normal dispositions of records and to prevent spoliation.  Another goal is to avoid the potential for sanctions and ethical issues facing those …

Continue Reading

The Cost of an Apology: Pennsylvania Considers Apology Law

Malpractice is devastating. Professionals work tirelessly to earn a degree (or more), develop client relationships and trust, and subsequently a book of business all of which can be at risk in the event of professional negligence. The professional’s reaction may be to approach the client or patient with an apology, explanation or consolation but there are serious risks to doing so. Depending on the professional’s E&O policy, an apology may constitute a waiver of coverage.  Moreover, that apology may be an admissible “confession” which can …

Continue Reading

Here’s to an Uneventful Fourth of July

July 4 is not the ideal time to consider insurance but for too many it is a reality. By way of a reminder, after voting for independence on July 2, 1776, in the midst of the American Revolution, Congress turned its attention to the Declaration of Independence.  The document was a statement explaining this decision, which had been prepared by a committee led by Thomas Jefferson. Congress debated and revised the wording of the Declaration, finally approving it on July 4, 1776.  …

Continue Reading

Supreme Court Changes the Standard for Retaliation Claims

Often, it’s not the crime but the cover-up that will do you in. In some ways, that sentiment is applicable to retaliation claims for alleged discrimination in the workplace. Or at least it was, until the Supreme Court’s recent decision in University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar. Previously, an employer facing a discrimination suit was susceptible to a retaliation theory despite establishing legitimate reasons for the alleged discriminatory conduct (usually terminating or demoting the employee).  Specifically, so long as the plaintiff could …

Continue Reading

The Insurance “Conspiracy” Facing A-Rod and the Yankees

Alex Rodriguez is widely considered one of the greatest baseball players of his generation, but much of his career is filled with controversy. The most recent debate concerns A-Rod’s receipt of a hefty salary from the Yankees although he has not played a single game this year. Reportedly, the 12-time All Star is now grumbling that the Yankees are intent on keeping him off of the field so as to trigger insurance dollars. In December 2007, Rodriguez and the Yankees agreed to a 10-year, $275 …

Continue Reading

Is Three a Crowd? The Intersection between Attorney-Client and Spousal Privileges

The attorney-client privilege is among the oldest and most established evidentiary privileges in law. Although it is perhaps the most frequently cited privilege, it certainly is not the only grounds to object to the disclosure of a client’s communications.  Spouses also enjoy a special relationship that justifies withholding certain communications. Under the so-called “spousal communications privilege,” a/k/a “marital privilege,” confidential communications between spouses may be protected from disclosure in civil and criminal cases.  But what happens when the attorney-client and …

Continue Reading

Hell’s Kitchen: Star Chef Sued for Wage & Hour Violations

On Thursday, June 13, 2013, a proposed class action was filed on behalf of all former and current employees of Chef Gordon Ramsey’s Los Angeles restaurant “The Fat Cow.” The class action is led by a former server, barista, and two hostesses who are taking their beef to California state court against the celebrity chef’s restaurant. The class action alleges that the restaurant’s management took tips from former employees, and violated a series of other wage-and-hour labor codes. The Fat Cow opened its doors on …

Continue Reading

Non-Profits at Risk: Unprepared and Underinsured

A recent study suggests that the non-profit sector is generally underinsured and unprepared for liability risks.  In its Nonprofit Risk Survey, available here an international risk advisor concluded that nonprofits are not allocating enough dollars to properly protect against risk.  Far too many non-profits have not completed an independent risk assessment meaning that they are unaware of their vulnerabilities.  Since many non-profits surveyed are purchasing the bare minimum coverage, this is a recipe for disaster.

Reportedly, non-profits are particularly susceptible to media liability, network …

Continue Reading

Breach of Contract or Negligence: Does it Really Matter?

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court is set to entertain argument on an important appellate issue regarding the types of damages available to a plaintiff in a legal malpractice dispute.  The decision may also highlight the fundamental differences, if any, between a malpractice suit grounded in tort or contract. In 2006, a national law firm agreed to represent the plaintiffs in the sale of a company that had incurred over $2 million in unpaid taxes.  According to the plaintiffs, the law firm advised them that the …

Continue Reading

Legal Implications of Philadelphia’s Deadly Building Collapse

On June 5 two Philadelphia buildings collapsed, killing 6 and injuring at least 13 others.  Contractors were in the process of demolishing an empty building when a four-story wall unexpectedly tumbled into the neighboring Salvation Army thrift store leaving a pile of debris and a cloud of smoke. Philadelphians, and beyond, are searching for answers and debating over who is to blame.

According to reports, the Philadelphia Department of Licenses and Inspections had evaluated the demolition site and determined on numerous occasions that …

Continue Reading